What families should do first
Build one timeline that follows the patient across every setting. Record the last time the person was known to be at neurological baseline, when each symptom appeared, who observed it, when 911 was called, arrival and triage times, clinician examinations, imaging, consultation, transfer, discharge, deterioration, and the encounter where stroke was confirmed. Preserve uncertainty honestly: an estimated time labeled as an estimate is more useful than a confident but inaccurate time.
Request the complete chart, not only the discharge summary. The useful file may include EMS run sheets, triage notes, neurological scores, physician and nursing notes, medication-administration records, CT and MRI images as well as reports, radiology timestamps, stroke-alert records, transfer-center calls, tele-neurology records, laboratory results, patient-portal messages, rehabilitation assessments, and billing records that identify otherwise missing services.
How Colorado timing rules affect the review
Colorado Revised Statutes § 13-80-102.5 generally bars a health-care negligence action unless it is instituted within two years after the claim accrues under § 13-80-108(1), and in no event more than three years after the act or omission. The statute lists exceptions, including knowing concealment and a retained unauthorized foreign object (each measured by a two-year discovery period), an injury and cause that could not have been known with reasonable diligence, and special rules for young minors and persons under disability. Public providers can involve separate governmental-immunity notice rules, so the accrual and repose dates need case-specific review.
Do not treat a general website summary as a filing-date calculation. The legally significant event may be the first missed diagnosis, a later failure to respond, the end of a course of treatment, a death, or a notice requirement that comes before suit. A lawyer should identify every involved provider and calculate each possible deadline separately.
Procedural rules a family may encounter
Colorado § 13-20-602 requires a certificate of review in professional-negligence actions against licensed professionals. The plaintiff's attorney must file the certificate for each licensed professional named, generally within sixty days after service of the complaint unless the court allows more time for good cause. The certificate states that the attorney consulted a person with expertise in the area of the alleged negligence who reviewed the known facts and relevant records and concluded the claim does not lack substantial justification; failure to file can result in dismissal.
These requirements are one reason a stroke case cannot be evaluated from the diagnosis alone. Counsel may need qualified experts to compare the contemporaneous symptoms with emergency medicine, radiology, neurology, nursing, hospital-transfer, or long-term-care standards. The expert must also address causation: what treatment or protection was realistically available, and what additional injury probably resulted from the delay.
Understanding Colorado's stroke-care system
Colorado has not adopted a state stroke-center designation list comparable to some neighboring systems in the sources reviewed for this guide. The statute instead creates a Stroke Advisory Board in the Department of Public Health and Environment (§ 25-3-115) to evaluate stroke prevention and treatment strategies, develop a statewide needs assessment, and study issues including the criteria national bodies use to designate hospitals for stroke care and whether a state designation is appropriate. In practice, a Colorado review should identify the hospital's national stroke certification, tele-stroke arrangements, and transfer relationships in effect on the incident date rather than relying on a state designation.
A stroke-center designation is context, not a verdict. It can help identify the hospital's represented capabilities and expected transfer relationships. It does not establish that every patient qualified for thrombolysis, thrombectomy, MRI, transfer, or admission. Those decisions depend on timing, stroke type, vessel findings, examination, contraindications, baseline function, patient wishes, and the information reasonably available at the time.
Questions that organize the medical evidence
- What was the patient's baseline speech, strength, balance, vision, cognition, and ability to walk?
- Were dizziness, double vision, facial change, one-sided weakness, numbness, severe headache, confusion, trouble speaking, swallowing difficulty, or inability to walk documented?
- Were symptoms improving, fluctuating, or recurring, and were repeat neurological examinations recorded?
- What did the original CT seek to rule out, and did the clinical question require vascular imaging, MRI, consultation, observation, or repeat testing?
- Was the patient within a treatment window, and if not, was thrombectomy or another pathway considered based on the available evidence?
- If the patient was discharged, were the diagnosis, unresolved symptoms, return precautions, supervision needs, and follow-up plan reasonable and clearly communicated?
When a nursing home or care facility was involved
The investigation may begin before the emergency department. A nursing home or assisted-living facility may have baseline assessments, change-in-condition notes, vital signs, medication records, therapy observations, physician notifications, family calls, EMS activation records, and staff statements. The central question is whether staff recognized and escalated a material neurological change. Hospital and facility responsibility should be evaluated separately rather than assuming one caused every delay.
Official Colorado legal sources
Official stroke-system and care sources
Request a Colorado lawyer review
Senior Justice Help can collect the state, facility or hospital, approximate date, injury, and contact information and forward the request for review by an appropriate attorney or intake team. A submission does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not guarantee that a lawyer will accept the matter.
Start a confidential Colorado stroke intake →
Return to the national Stroke Misdiagnosis Center →
Editorial review
Written and editorially reviewed for family clarity
Written by: Senior Justice Help Editorial Team, Family questions and nursing home records research team
Pages are written for families, checked against public agency sources, and reviewed for clarity, sourcing, and overclaiming. The site does not provide medical advice or legal advice.